CHICAGO, Feb. 7, 2000/PR Newswire/ Lovers looking for the perfect Valentine's gift should think twice before giving a bottle of toxic chemicals to their sweethearts. Recent analysis of Calvin Klein's "Eternity Eau de Parfum" (Eternity) by an industry laboratory specializing in fragrance chemistry revealed 41 ingredients. These include some known to be toxic to the skin, respiratory tract, nervous, and reproductive systems, and others known to be carcinogens; no toxicity data are available on several ingredients, while data on most are inadequate. Additionally, some ingredients are volatile and a source of indoor air pollution. Since 1995, several consumers have complained to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of neurological and respiratory problems due to Eternity. The analysis was recently commissioned by the Environmental Health Network (EHN) as many members had complained of asthma, migraine, sensitization, or multiple chemical sensitivity when exposed to Eternity. Based on this analysis, EHN filed a Citizen Petition with the FDA on May 11, 1999, which was subsequently endorsed by the Cancer Prevention Coalition. The petition requests that the FDA take administrative action and declare Eternity "misbranded" or "adulterated" since it does not carry a warning label as required by the terms of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. Grounds for requesting the warning label include FDA regulation 21CFR Sec. 740/10: "Each ingredient used in a cosmetic product and each finished cosmetic product shall be adequately substantiated for safety prior to marketing. Any such ingredient or product whose safety is not adequately substantiated prior to marketing is misbranded unless it contains the following conspicuous statement on the principal display panel: Warning: the safety of this product has not been determined." Since May, over 700 consumers with health problems from exposure to various mainstream fragrances have written to the FDA supporting EHN's petition. The FDA responded on November 30 to the effect that they had been unable to reach a decision on the grounds of "other priorities and the limited availability of resources." The petition is thus still open for further public complaints and endorsements. [Note: Informing the public of this petition currently before the FDA has been a grassroots, word-of-mouth effort.]
Valentine sweethearts should switch to organically grown (pesticide-free) roses or other flowers as safe alternatives to mainstream perfumes.
Contact: Samuel S. Epstein, M.D., Professor of Environmental Betty Bridges, RN, Advisory Board member of EHN, and owner/webmistress of Fragranced Products Information Network of Virginia; E-Fax:: (801)340-3578; e-mail fpinva@fpinva.org; Website: http://www.fpinva.org
Barbara Wilkie, board member, Environmental Health Network
When you reformat this for a flyer, please have the FDA information appear on the second side of your sheet . . . and remove this note. Thanks. -- barb
Write to the FDA about your adverse reactions to synthetic scents, or your children's adverse reactions, or the negative impacts on the health of your elderly parents. The FDA will do nothing unless they hear from several hundred thousand individuals. Use just one method of communication with the FDA. Contact info: Reference: Docket Number: 99P-1340/CP 1
FAX Number -- 301.827.6870 Letters may be mailed to:
Dockets Management Branch Thank you for taking the time and energy to inform the FDA about the negative impacts of synthetic fragrances upon your health, or the health of your loved ones.
|
http://www.ehnca.org/www/ehnlinx/p.htm#Posters
EHN's homepage
www.ehnca.org
Fragranced Products Information Network, site of Betty Bridges, RN
http://www.fpinva.org